Breaking News

By what authority, rebuttal No legal authority.pdf. BAR members (attorneys, judges and law professors) claim we the People have no authority to restore Common Law, but they cannot show by what authority they make such a claim, We the People answer them. Letters from NY Court tru counsel - Prudinti tru counsel 9-26-13.pdf  Prudinti tru counsel 10-10-13.pdf


Breaking News - December 8th 2014 - Fifty Common Law Grand Juries filed Presentments indicting Code Enforcement Officer Pantaleo for the murder of Eric Garner in the United States District Court for the Southern District of NY: Read the Presentment HERE > Officer_Pantaleo_NY._Presentment.pdf for the murder of Eric Garner

Breaking News November 10, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury in every State files writ_quo_warranto.pdf in every Federal District Court, United States Supreme Court and served upon every Federal Judge and all 9 US Supreme Court Justices, see video below.

Breaking News October 29, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury files mandamus.pdf  ordering Federal Judge to show cause why he did not obey the Law of the Land

BREAKING NEWS October 17, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury granted Terry Trussell's petition for Writ Habaes Corpus - Terry was asked to serve on a statutory grand jury in Dixie County. He was selected by the presiding Judge Munkittrick as the foreman. As foreman, he was made aware of alleged criminal behavior by those government officials pushing Common Core curriculum in our public schools , who allegedly took bribes of money to change the curriculum. So, according to his duty, Terry tried to present the evidence to the statutory grand jury but the State Attorney Siegmeister interfered with his ability to perform the job of Grand Jury Foreman as per Florida Grand Jury Handbook and Florida Statutes 905.

So Terry wrote up and put into the public record a Bill of Information that included criminal charges of obstruction of justice along with jury tampering for the SA, and also hand delivered a 7 page letter to Judge Munkittrick , among other things, detailing to her the alleged felonies that he had witnessed Siegmesiter commit. Due to the actions of Seigmesiter, Terry declared the statutory grand jury as tainted and dismissed it.

Nothing happened so Terry was in a position where his sworn duty was to investigate any crime that came to his awareness according to Florida Statutes but the statutory grand jury had become tainted by State Attorney Seigmesiter. So Terry, knowing that the US is a Common Law Country and Florida is a Common Law state, asked the People of Dixie County if they wanted to, in accordance with the 5th amendment to our US Constitution,  stand up their own independent Common Law Grand Jury, which they did. After considering the evidence, The People's Grand Jury Under Common Law in Dixie County handed down two True Bills of Presentment, one against the alleged crimes of the SA and the other against the officials, after accepting money, pushing Common Core. This True Bills were also put into the public record.

In an act of retaliation against Terry for reporting crimes, the establishment is attacking Terry for doing his job as Grand Jury Foreman by reporting the True Bills and putting them into the public record. A Florida Department of Law Enforcement agent Frank Linton filed a defective affidavit, including with perjury and omission of exculpatory evidence, which Terry rebutted, but the Court Clerk has removed evidence from the public record. Also, the judge's order was defective as well as the arrest warrant was defective, all for various serious reasons.

So Terry is charged for crimes because he reported crimes, and he was first in early Sept, kept in jail about 24 hours, and bailed out. He then was arrested at his arraignment Oct 9 on charges of Failure to Appear because he did appear but the judge refused to recognize him. Pls go to and find all the articles and audio on Terry. You can listen to  Judge Hankinson call Terry's name 3 times, and Terry respond three times, and then the judge can be heard to say something like ...let the record show that Terry George Trussell did not appear, and I order his bail revoked and his immediate arrest. The sheriffs simply walked over and took Terry by the arm and lead him out of the court room and handcuffed him and took him to jail. There are over 20 signed, sworn, notarized affidavits that Terry did indeed appear even though the judge said he did not.

The coverup that is being engineered to hide criminal activity and to punish Terry appears to include many officials in both the county government and in the Circuit Court judicial system as well as FDLE. Please remember that as a Grand Juror, Terry has complete immunity for anything he does except for if he were to breach a witnesses rights. Since there were no witnesses called, he certainly did not breach anybody's rights. As a result on October 17, 2014 Unified Common Law Grand Jury granted Terry Trussell's petition for Writ Habaes Corpus. see petition and Habaes Corpus below.

  • BREAKING NEWS SEPTEMBER 16, 2014: In-Depth Interview with Terry Trussell of Dixie County, FL - Arrested by a Corrupt Judiciary. On Friday, September 12th, 2014, on the 5-year anniversary of the 9/12 March On Washington where 1.2 million people gathered in protest of the despicable behavior by their representatives in Washington, D.C., Terry Trussell of Dixie County, FL and I sat down for an in-depth interview to discuss why he was arrested and charged with several felonies. On September 2nd, 2014 just after 3:00 PM in the afternoon, Terry Trussell's life was changed forever. terry_trussell_interview.mp3

  • Consolidated True Bill.pdf Filed July 14th 2014 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York In one federal filing we refiled the indictments of 14 State judges and 2 clerks.

  • Bill of Information.pdf Filed July 14th 2014 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York Paper revealing that New York courts are controled by tyrants.

  • Hybrid papers disclaimer.pdf The purpose of this disclaimer is to deny any connection with Mr. Joaquin Mariano DeMoreta-Folch, who titles himself a God Grace Administrator, concerning his filing of papers in Sheridan County, Nebraska and any other papers he may have filed in other states/counties.
  • PRESS RELEASE DISCLAIMER.pdf The purpose of this disclaimer is to deny any connection with David Robinson’s PRESS RELEASE For JULY 4, 2014. NLA does not support or share the views of the following contents.

POSTED MAY 27, 2014 Federal Court Order to dismiss case and our response with a writ of error and an ultimatum. Take note that in the file Mandamus there is one Mandamus commanding the Federal Court to obey and a second (to be signed by the judge) from the Federal Court to the State courts.

POSTED MAY 9, 2014 Court date JUNE 2, 2014, stay-tuned for details.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; James T. Foley Courthouse; Suite 509; 445 Broadway; Albany, NY 12207 on the 2nd day of June, 2014 at 9:30 AM;

POSTED APRIL 23, 2014 .

(518) 625-3160;    FAX - (518) 943-0247
If you need assistance with coordinating travel from your area, you may call or email Ollie Johnson, one of the NY State coordinators at (845) 204-8158 and
Court Hearing Thursday April 24, 2014 at 9:3o AM. If you cannot make it please fax, mail and call to let them know we are watching.

On March 28, 2014 the Columbia County Clerk retured our March 26th filing. We then filed the Writ of Quo Warranto, Writ of Probition and Writ of Mandamus.pdf with the Greene Couty Clerk on April 10, 2014and our hearing is now scheduled for Thursday, April 24, 2014 at 9:30 AM.

Posted Monday March 26, 2014
Writ of Prohibition, Warning to the Court. WRIT OF PROHIBITION.pdf

Posted Monday March 24, 2014
Quo Warranto filed in Columbia County New York, This is the begining of the end we need everyone paying attention. Quo Waranto filed 3-24-14.pdf

Posted Friday March 21, 2014
6th Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic Dear Sheriff.pdf

Posted Thursday March 10, 2014
5th Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic - 14-03-25 memo Sovereign.pdf

Posted Thursday March 6, 2014
News Wire Press Release 3-5-14.pdf
New York Law Journal, Albany NY. - John Caher Senior Reporter 3-6-14.mp3 

Posted Tuesday March 10, 2014
4th Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic -
Letter from Franklin County New York Sheriff to the Unified New York Common Law Grand Jury and the UNYCLGJ response - Franklin Sheriff letter and response.pdf

Posted Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Jersey City man advocating grand jury system with no government involvement.pdf

Posted Monday, Febuary 24, 2014
3rd Open letter to all New York Oath-takers 14-2-25 Memo to oath takers.pdf

Posted Thursday, February 20, 2014 Peliminary interviw 14-2-21 Fox News.com_.mp3 
The Anti-Defamation League claims adherents of the sovereign citizen movement are forming their own vigilante “grand juries”  ADL Press Release.pdf NLA Press release in response to ADA's fabricated press release. NLA answer to ADL Press Release.pdf

Posted Thursday, February 20, 2014 -
Phone call from Daily News in Charleston South Carolina press release - Press phone call 2-20-14.mp3

Posted Thursday, February 20, 2014 -
2nd Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers
, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic - 14-2-20 MEMORANDUM.pdf

Posted Wednesday, February 19, 2014 -
Written article on Who is Organizing CLGJ's.pdf

Posted Wednesday, February 19, 2014 -
A must listen to  American Underground Network.mp3 recording on NSA's plan to shut down communications and what you can do about it

Posted Wednesday, February 12, 2014 -
Broome County NY answer to memo 2-12-14.pdf
answering 14-2-10 MEMORANDUM.pdf (letter) to oath takers.

Posted Monday, February 10, 2014
New York Unified Common Law Grand Jury Indicts Green County Judge and Court Clerk for Felony Rescue and other charges. Presentment 2-10-14.pdf, with letter.pdf to judge

1st Open Letter to all NY Oath-takers, acting Judicial gate keepers, elected or appointed to secure the Republic14-2-10 MEMORANDUM.pdf

Posted Monday, January 20, 2014
Saint Johns County Florida Common Law Grand Jury files Writ of Mandamus.pdf demanding access in the courthouse in order to function under judicial auspices.

Posted Wednesday, January 1, 2014 
From the Unified New York Supreme Court Bench to Greene County New York Supreme Court - Mandamus to Judge.pdf and Mandamus to Clerk.pdf Final notice to be delivered by sheriff Monday January 6, 2014.

Posted Saturday, Nov. 22, 2013
KVSL Radio 1450AM/107.9FM; Lakeside, AZ Guest Speaker John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement.

Published: Saturday, Nov. 9, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Citizens group wants common law grand jury in Westmoreland County

Friday - November 8, 2013, By Rich Cholodofsky, A citizens group filed court documents on Friday seeking to convene a common law grand jury in Westmoreland County, but legal experts say such a body has no real authority. More...

11-7-13 letter from green county.pdf
Letter from New York Supreme Court, Greene County to the People of New York the common law fifth Amendment is null and Void. The Peoples' response - 11-11-13Letter to greene county clerk.pdf

November 7, 2013
Web Conference call with Randy Shannon and guest speaker John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement.

November 6, 2013
Web Conference call with Jeremy and guest speaker John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement.

November 4, 2013 -
Common Law Grand Jury files Quo Warranto.pdf with Greene County Supreme Court for hesitating to process True Bill of Indictment, against their colleagues, as required by law for arraignment, scheduling, and the removal from office ... For more details read the Quo Warranto.

October 31, 2013
Blog Talk Radio with Drake Bailey's interview with John Darash, spokes person for the Common Law Grand Jury movement, who explains how Liberty’s Light is moving across America by the constituting of Common Law Juries in all 3141 counties which has taken deep roots, now in 48 states, in just four short months.

October 25, 2013  Press Release 10-25-13.pdf copy
Released by

COPY OF FILED INDICTMENT Presentment 10-21-13-1.pdf
On Wednesday, October 23, 2013 an indictment was handed down, and filed at the New York Supreme Court, Greene County; located at 320 Main Street Catskill, NY by (Eighteen) Unified New York Common Law Grand Juries from Bronx County, Columbia County, Dutchess County, Greene County, Kings County, Nassau County, New York County, Orange County, Putnam County, Queens County, Rockland County, Sullivan County, Suffolk County, Westchester County, Niagara County, Ulster County, Monroe County, and Schenectady County of New York; against New York (1) Supreme Court Chief Administrative Judge A. Gail Prudenti; (2) Deputy Chief Judge Michael V. Coccoma; (3) Suffolk County District Administrative Judge Judge C. Randall Hinrichs; and (4) Administrative Judge Allan D. Scheinkman, 9th Judicial District; for High Treason, Conspiracy, Obstruction of Justice, RICO, and eleven other charges.

October 21, 2013 - Press Release 10-21-13.pdf
Released by
New York is “ground zero” - A major grassroots’ movement that started in New York with the constituting of its first Common Law Grand Jury on July 18, 2013 has taken America by storm, spreading to 48 States in just a few months. New York has constituted Grand Juries in the Bronx, New York, Kings, Queens, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, Rockland, Putnam, Orange, Sullivan, Ulster, Dutchess, Columbia, Greene, Schenectady, Monroe and Niagara counties in just three months, by people keen on setting the brush fires of freedom in the minds of men.

On the other hand, our hired servants prefer the status quo, thereby they're not too keen to receive the People back in control of the Peoples judicial and political processes. Lysander Spooner, author of Trial by Jury (1852) said: “any government, that is its own judge of, and determines authoritatively for, the people, what its own powers are over the people, is an absolute government, of course. It has all the powers that it chooses to exercise. There is no other, or at least, no more accurate definition of despotism than this”. Thomas Jefferson in writing the Declaration of Independence said: “That to secure Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”. It is the People (Grand Jury) that consent to government. To dismiss the Common Law Grand Jury is to dismiss the Bill of Rights and reject our founding document, the Declaration of Independence.

The Common Law Grand Jury is an unalienable right, protected under the Law by the Fifth Amendment. Common Law is synonymous with Natural Law which can never be codified or supplanted, for Common Law is our American Heritage, born of the Declaration of Independence. But four New York Supreme Court Judges would have us believe that Common Law can be superseded by four progressive judges in the (1961) case Wood v Hughes. To the contrary, in a stunning six to three (1992) Decision that went unnoticed, until now, Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority said: “The grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. “It is a constitutional fixture in its own right. In fact the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people”... “Our Founding Fathers presciently thereby, created a "buffer" the people may rely upon for justice, when public officials, including judges, criminally violate the law.”… “The common law of the Fifth Amendment demands a traditional functioning grand jury”… “It is in effect a fourth branch of government governed and administered to directly by and on behalf of the American people, and its authority emanates from the Bill of Rights”. Thus, citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their own grand juries and present "True Bills" of indictment to the court, which is then required to commence a criminal proceeding.

Furthermore, on "Constitutional Issues" the United States Supreme Court rulings are the "Law of the Land" (unless repugnant to the same) and therefore over rules all State Supreme Court rulings.

Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman have taken it upon themselves to prevent the 18 New York constituted Common Law Grand Juries from taking their inherited seats as consentors. These judges have filed false reports with the FBI on at least three different occasions and have threatened We the People, claiming there would be “Regrettable legal consequences” should We the People continue in pursuit of our unalienable right to consent, established under the Declaration of Independence and protected under the Fifth Amendment.

On October 15, 2013  the Unified (18) Common Law Grand Juries answered Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman with a final letter, citing acts of treason and giving them until Friday, October 18th to obey the People and step aside or face the consequences of indictment by presentment of a True Bill. 10-15-13 Letter to Judges.pdf

On Thursday, October 17th 2013, at 3:22 PM Judge A. Gail Prudenti, Judge Michael V. Coccoma, Judge C. Randall Hinrichs, and Judge Allan D. Scheinkman replied … “your correspondence is based on an erroneous reading of the law, and is hereby rejected”. Therefore said True Bill was filed with the court Monday October 21, 2013, by certified mail. Presentment 10-21-13-1.pdf

Please support our endeavor, help keep NLA on the web,
Donate $5.00 or more a month, and become a Premier Member, Thank you.


John Darash's picture

BREAKING NEWS - Posted Wednesday, January 1, 2014 Posted Mandamus.pdf to Greene County New York Supreme Court Judge Final notice to be delivered by sheriff on Monday January 6, 2014. Post everywhere and e-mail and fax to local and national news media.

citizensubject's picture





citizensubject's picture

United States v. Hudson, 7 Cranch 32 (1812), the Supreme Court held that there was no jurisdiction to try common law crimes in the courts of the United States.

citizensubject's picture

IS UNconstitutional. It amounts to a bill of attainder. American Common Law is simply CASELAW or Precedent. So if "law" is made from the bench, it is enforced on a defendant as a result of alleged conduct when THAT "law" did not exist until the "judge" Opines.

"United States v. Hudson and Goodwin, 11 U.S. 32 (1812), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that Congress must first enact a law criminalizing an activity, attach a penalty, and give the federal courts jurisdiction over the offense in order for the court to render a conviction."

citizensubject's picture

How do we search to see the court record or docket or progress of this proceeding ? Is there a case number ? or chain of events/service/notice ?

douglas's picture

There has to be a record of any legal action. Each state is a little different but I think the basics are much the same. You may have to go to the Clerk of the Courts office but some records are on line.

Your research is going to depend on how much information you have. You will need at least the name of the parties involved, the date if you know it, civil or criminal. If you have a case number or docket number it makes things real easy. The Clerk should help you find the basic info and point you in the right direction. They are not going to do the work for you or give you legal advise but they should help you get started and answer any questions you may have.

It's ALL public record. It takes a little bit of a learning curve but after you learn the system it's not hard.

Retirednanny5's picture

This news should be sent to all sheriffs reminding them of their
Oath of office and do what this Greene county sheriff is doing
On behalf of the people's legal constitutional rights.

EmilyCL's picture

What a jerk the officer was. All the cops seem to care about these days is power and control and inflicting brute force on people. It is disgusting. They should be showing a little deference since they are public servants after all. But we haven't seen that from them in 50 years.

fitzie777's picture

Sorry about the format. I have the official release but had to copy and paste. Don't see upload link here?
We are anticipating the publication to see what is actually put in B&W. Gave her the full story, Clerk only provided partial be continued....

News Release
Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court
Lynn Hurley
Communications Director
Fax 520.866.5320
Chad A. Roche, Clerk
PINAL COUNTY, AZ (1/28/2014) – A group identifying itself as, “Pinal County Grand Jury” has contacted the Clerk’s office to demand the “constitution of a Common Law Grand Jury.” The certified letter, sent without return address appears to be the result of an “open election by the showing of hands” at the Maricopa Community Church on October 3, 2013.
The three signers of the accompanying affidavit, Donald Corgan, Shirley Mae Corgan and Christine Leona Fitzpatrick indicated that by their notarized signatures that the group convened at the Maricopa Community Church and have “unanimously voted for the re-establishing of the Common Law Grand Jury here in Pinal County, for the purpose of returning Justice to our judicial and political processes.”
Clerk Chad A. Roche indicated that he will research the claims of this group. “The most important issue at hand is to – above all – adhere to the Rule of Law,” he stated. Clerk Roche continued, “My office is sensitive to, and will be responsive to, the needs of the citizens of Pinal County.” The Grand Jury process itself is under the control of the Presiding Judge. The office of the Clerk of the Superior Court serves in a ministerial role in accordance with Arizona Rules and Statutes.
The Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court is committed to providing quality customer service, ensuring the integrity and access to court records by supporting the Judicial process through efficient Records Management, Financial Administration and Jury Service.
The Florence office of the Clerk of the Superior Court is located at 971 N. Jason Lopez Circle in the Pinal County
Justice Complex, Building A. It is open to serve the public on weekdays from 8 a.m. until 5 p.m. Satellite offices are
located in Apache Junction and Casa Grande. The office of the COSC can be reached at 520-866-5300.
To learn more about the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court in Pinal County, please visit
Follow Chad Roche on Facebook at and the Clerk’s
page is located at
as the Pinal County Clerk of the Superior Court. The COSC You Tube Channel is located here: You can follow Chad on Twitter at @ChadRoche1

Jag69's picture

Need organizers for Collier County, Florida. Anyone know someone in Collier County, Florida please ask them to step up. Thank You.

unKonnon Law u.s.trusted advisor's picture

Texas state v STATE OF TEXAS John Doe v JOHN DOE dallas county v COUNTY OF DALLAS organic v FEDERAL CIVIL ADMINISTRATION court clerk v CLERK OF THE COURT notice evidence of both and realize the federal civil administration is overlayed on the organic american land

nestingwave's picture

In my view -- this awareness is essential to the success of the Common Law Grand Juries.

OK -- the PTB are frightened greatly by the growing grass-roots awareness of the CLGJ and all the counties across America standing up and constituting. Why? Because they know full well that they have been contributing to the establishment of a Fascist/Communist New World Order by undermining the principals of liberty and freedom and -- of course -- the God-endowed Natural Common Law of we the people. In other words -- our CLGJs are a threat to those who are daily committing treason. That is, of course, the reason why they have 1) tried to ignore us 2) tried to debunk us 3) pretend that we have no "legal standing" 4) tried to portray us as a bunch of whackos -- or label us as anything but the voice of the people who are fed up with the constant tyranny being shoved upon us daily by a traitorous agenda whose only God is $$$ and power over the bodies, minds and souls of men, women and children.

These tyrants WILL hold out until the very last moment -- that is -- until a few of them start to find themselves BEHIND BARS. This -- is the Elephant in the living room which we must face. We MUST not only have the sheriffs fully on board -- but -- we must be ready to watch their back and support them FULLY.

How do we do this?

I do not know. But -- if a group of us goes up to a sheriff (such as the sheriff of Green County NY) to DEMAND that he make arrests -- we better have some real solid support for that sheriff WHO IS IN EFFECT PUTTING HIS VERY LIFE AND THE LIFE OF HIS FAMILY ON THE LINE.

Yes -- we have virtue (Justice) and truth on our side -- but these tyrants we are coming against are completely LAWLESS and will, of course, seek to destroy any sheriff trying to arrest them -- regardless of what criminal and/or subversive and/or violent activity they must do to stay out of jail. They are totally BRAIN-WASHED and fully believe in their abominable system of winks and corruption.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

One other thing. I hope some of you are aware that the Common Law movement is NOT confined to the U.S. of A. Take a look at this:

mrbagobeans's picture

they have a lot to learn -they seem to have indicted the whole world. anything they may have accomplished could have been done by CLGJ at the local level.
How do we know this org. is on the level?

fitzie777's picture

Same of story. It's as if they are reading off a script. ""They have no legal basis to do that. Citizens taking the law into their own hands squarely violates the Constitution," Shealy said." This from your press coverage in S.C. Here is a quote for our local press coverage:
“We have been advised that groups of this nature do not have legal standing in the state of Arizona at this time,” clerk Chad Roche wrote in an email. “Documents presented must be from a recognized source according to the laws of our State. The Arizona Attorney General’s office opinion is clear; only the Grand Jury or the prosecutors’ office can indict.” and even more infurating:
In a statement, Pinal County clerk Chad Roche said the grand jury process is under control of the presiding judge – in this case Judge Stephen McCarville.
While that statement is true, county clerk speaks of the puppet grand jury!
Even though the press coverage has been minions making unsupported statements of facts and law, we are getting the coverage. They know we are coming, lawfully and will intent. And that is enough to keep me pushing on.

sofasurferlinux's picture

Just wondering...I read that the FBI approached some CLGJ people to question them about their activities. Upon the FBI hearing the truth about this movement they when away and did not return. So, I wonder if the FBI would be a party to approaching tyrant judges and such and explain to them how they are committing crimes by their not recognizing the CLGJ.

citizensubject's picture

I believe that would be the same as sending one of the hens to the fox's den to request him and his friends stop eating the other chickens.

fitzie777's picture

If you read the Feb 19 article posted at breaking news, conversation with FBI, it would be highly unlikely to get any enforcement from them. As is the case, I am finding out, "they", FBI, Judge, Prosecutors, Attorneys, local law enforcement...etc, have no clue about the law. "just following orders" And so, as the memorandums to the oath takers in trying to get them informed and educated, short of them reading and absorbing it, FBI or any of these incompetents, will continue to follow orders, and demonize freedom and sovereignty

sofasurferlinux's picture

On the monday night radio show I heard discussion of using Linux operating system to make your computer more secure. Linux IS more secure than windows is but against the government's criminal hacking it is probably no match.

Linux is FREE to anyone who wants to use it instead of using Windows. Linux is Free and Windows costs what....a couple hundred dollars every few years? Any software that will work for windows and that costs money money money can be matched with equal or superior FREE software that will run on Linux. Windows will not operate on very old computers. It is to big to fit on the hard drive and it is to complicated for the old computer circuitry. Linux work great on almost any computer, even very old ones.

You can have both Windows and Linux on the same hard drive. You choose, at start up, which one you want to use. You can later remove windows after you dicide you no longer want it on your computer. You can even put it on a DVD and run it from the DVD to take it for a test drive and then choose the option to install it on you PC later.

Linux require no defragmentation, no anti-virus (although you can use it if you want to be sure. Linux does not have issues with "broken DLL files" that nobody understands.

There is MANY MANY differant varients of Linux. Here are some...

I have found the varient called "Ubuntu" to be the best and easiest for me. Here is where you get it...

You can get 24/7 support for Ubuntu on a forum that is probably the best and fastest source of help that I have found on the internet. Here is that forum... You can also go on this forum to ask peoples opinions of Ubuntu and learn more about it before you decide to install it.

I have used Ubuntu for many years. It does not "break" like Windows does. Mine has run for years with no break downs.

One last thing. If you decide to try it out, here are the program packages (all free) that you can get instead of using the software that Windows uses, and its all as good or probably better that the Windows versions...

And a couple other thoughts...The reason Windows users have problems with "flash player" is because they are using Windows and Flash Player. YOU WILl NOT HAVE ANY OF THESE ISSUES WITH LINUX SOFTWARE. Windows is a defective product designed to REQUIRE costly upgrades. Linux will download upgrades and updates, as needed, automatically and you will not even be aware that it is happening. Videos will play flawlessly and so will audio. Sites requiring Flash Player will not be a problem any more. Word processing will not be an issue. Finding other software to use with linux to perform other tasks will never be a problem. And everything is FREE.

There is no reason to have Windows on your PC unless you enjoy breakdowns, stress, data loss, viruses, hackers and throwing away large amounts of money on a product that will be obsolete in a few months or years.

Hope this helps.

nestingwave's picture

I have been having nothing but problems with my Windows 7. I may have the opportunity to get a Linux system and give it a try. Thanks for all the info you have offered.

JAZ's picture

I have had Linux for quite some time...Ubuntu 12.04 LTS version. However, within the last month or so my system has been acting up and becoming unstable. After listening to the audio under Feb 19 from the Amn Underground Network, he states in there that Ubuntu is not reommended for security as they sell their data to Amazon. I am now having Mint 65 Petra installed on my computer.

For an overseas email account, I use They are based in Switzerland and their metadata is stored there and they explicitly stated that they do not share their metadata with the USA or the EU, nor can these two entities access it. Therefore, I recommend everyone sign up for a confidesk email account among all your group members for NLA correspondence. The data is encrypted both ways when both sender and receiver have a confidesk email account. I've had this email account now for over two years and never had spam or any other problems that I had with Yahoo. Yahoo, gmail, and all other USA email account entities are all accessible to the NSA.

fitzie777's picture

Great advice, and thank you very much. I will check it out. I have heard about ubuntu again thank you from a tech challenged people.

nestingwave's picture

We must have law enforcements from our sheriffs. And that means -- ALL the way. Now perhaps we have realized by now that these criminals will NOT do anything unless some ARRESTS are made by the sheriff first to let them know that they MUST obey the principles of the Constitution FOR the United States and the Common Law given to the people of America by our Creator .

Herein is a big problem because before these traitors acknowledge the law they will have to see that there are REAL 3D CONSEQUENCES for ignoring it.

Early on -- someone here said "someone needs to tell sheriff Mack about NLA."

Well . . . I sent him an email inviting him to find out about NLA and here is what he wrote back in his email:

I know Darash and this is all bogus. I am tired of beating my head against the wall on this issue. This whole
thing is putting the cart before the horse as there are NO sheriffs anywhere in America, no not a single one,
who are on board with this. It is not working and the success of this movement has been grossly exaggerated.
I would love it to work, but it is not and will not until we get sheriffs on board.
This movement proves people are starving for a solution and will believe anything. If it was working I'd join forces with
you right this minute. It is not working.

I do not think that Sheriff Richard Mack fully understands -- but he is especially discouraged by the attitudes of his fellow sheriffs who are TOO willing to "go along to get along." After all -- by going up against these entrenched criminals -- any sheriff is going to need LOTS of backup. His very life and the life of his family and friends is on the line bigtime -- not to mention his entire career in our present dysfunctional society. Extraordinary VALOR is required. (i.e. lots and lots of guts.)

John has said that sheriff Mack has somewhat been "poisoned."

Perhaps that is true but I cannot help but think that he has been somewhat discouraged by the sheriff's fear of going against the "status quo."

One or two successful arrests will change that.

But -- THAT is what it is going take.

Now -- I suspect that John and his team have already thought through this to the best extent possible but the time is rapidly approaching when it will be necessary for the handcuffs. That is the nitty-gritty law school in action.

However -- I predict that other events which are unexpected to most people at the moment will occur and that they will involve the mass arrests (long planned) of the criminals who are the KINGPINS of this now defunct and rapidly disintegrating so-called "New World Order." Actually -- it is the OLD FASCIST WORLD ORDER of DESPOTISM and TYRANNY -- on steroids.

You and I are not the only ones fed up with this totalitarian lawlessness -- and the pending huge operation against these insane tyrants is GLOBAL -- but -- the key to our future and the future of our children is what happens right here in the U.S. of A.

So -- hang in there -- work as best you can for the constitution of Common Law Grand Juries -- be patient -- and you will soon see that events soon to unfold will open up the way for our Grand Juries to be fully established and invited into our courthouses. Our victory will be sooner than we think!

sofasurferlinux's picture

Sheriff Mack and his CSPOA have had every opportunity to stand up and voice their opinion when rougue sheriffs and police beat innocent civilians and tazers children and old people. Not a word comes from the great ex-sheriff. O, but every one should keep sending money to the CSPOA and attend the convention and listen to the talky talky. How many sheriffs have taken back the management of the forests from the feds and started manageing the forests for MINIMUM COMBUSTION? How many sheriffs have exercised their athority to order the prosecution and firing of violent police officers in their counties? How many sheriffs have ordered the feds to cease and desist from entering their counties...PERIOD? How many Sheriffs have cast aside federal rules and allowed the construction of homes or county improvement projects even though there is a (questionably) endangered species standing in the way? I contacted a few sheriffs during our surrounding local election times and learned that most of them are as ignorant as king Hussein is about our rights and their responsibilities. I think that the CLGJ movement stands a better chance of educating sheriffs on its own than depending on ex-sheriff Mack. Face it Mack, people are bored with hearing your same old story about drinking unpasturized milk. People want to see real cop work in the name of our rights. Hey, heres a thought. How about shutting down the NSA SPY CENTER IN UTAH? O, thats right...NSA is the law of the land.

fitzie777's picture

Ah, the Great Sheriff Mack. The book deals, the speaking engagements, the lawsuit, have made him drunk with with a false sense of importance and relevance. It can happen to anyone. Myself included. However, my prayer every morning, "if it be YOUR will and all the glory to You. I am but a tool, and servant to Your word. Thank you for all my blessings and protect me from the evil forces. Amen
Apparently, deputy dog mack, has lost his way. Pray he will get back on track.

angela desmond's picture

John Caher, another clueless sentry for the status quo who's lost in the matrix and doesn't even know why. Law journal reporter? Take him away from statutes and he's lost. Only the brainwashed or paid NWO minions allowed into mainstream (lame-stream?) press.

citizensubject's picture

John Caher is representative of many many many Amerikans

genesis.restoration's picture

Listen to the questions that John Caher ask and listen to the answers that John Darash gives(listen to the audio above Posted Thursday March 6, 2014)

What is new and what is different? what is this all about?

What is a common law grand jury?

Can you can convene a grand jury of your friends and invite somebody?

How does this work? if it's not the court system then who sets it up?

Under your system who sets up the grand jury?

When you say New York is the first to establish a common law grand jury what are you talking about?

How is life different for me as of the 27th of February 2014? What happened on the 27th?

As a result of that how are things different?

What can the common law grand jury do and not do? As a practical matter what can you do?

What is the story?

Think about the questions for yourself and how you would answer, do you understand why you're answering the way you are? When you understand the questions and the legitimate answers you can go in confidence to establish you're common law grand jury in your county, you can do this!

To learn more get with your county coordinators and state coordinators,

Kevin ( NY State coordinator)

Joe Kelley's picture

A false and misleading question does not originate from the authorizing agent as being obvious false and misleading. A false and misleading answer does not originate from the authorizing agent as being obviously false and misleading.

This truth ought to be intimately understood.

Please consider how this idea offered by me, as I authorize this message, offered, to those who read it.

The Biblical concept of innocence may help, if those who are reading are inclined to connect those relevant dots.

Innocence is lost when the authorizing agent willfully intends to fabricate a false and misleading message; the mind become guilty at that point in that place as that individual seeks to mislead the object of his or her evil intent.

White lies told by children, who ARE innocent, is not the same thing as criminal frauds who are presumed to be innocent until proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be guilty of mind in a trial by jury of due process that is due everyone based upon the Golden Rule. Found guilty by 12 unanimously agreed upon deliberators who were randomly picked for the specific purpose of establishing, at least, a record of who is guilty of injuring who, willfully, so as to defend the injured from further harm - at least.

Some people reach for punishment of the guilty.

So, in context, as a Work Shop for potential jurists who exist in the jury pool of this country, or this Nation, is there a victim in this case?

I offer the opinion, as an administrator in San Bernardino County, established or constituted this week, that there is ample incuplatory evidence in this case that we the people, all the innocent people at least, are being willfully injured by this so called reporter as this so called reporter fabricates falsehoods designed to mislead many as yet to be named victims.

This is vitally important offers of opinions.

If other potential jurists in the jury pool of this country (caliphs reality), or this Nation (Legal Fiction or "in our hearts and minds"?), do not understand this opinion, the I offer another opinion concerning a need to learn why the opinion offered is a vital one.

The future of posterity is at stake.

If posterity will exist in a rapidly expanding miserably hell on earth, as many inculpatory sources of evidence prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that future reality facing posterity is purchased with willful deceptions of this specific design in this specific case.

Is it a story?

That is an example of a false and misleading question in a case where the author of the question intends to answer that question negatively. It is a setup type question.

Of course it is a story. The real question avoided has to do with the significance of the story. The story exists factually. The gate keepers who resort to deception are not the same thing as the gate keepers who are intending, willfully intending, to keep out the enemies of liberty who lie for their personal gain at the expense of their innocent victims.

I know I write too many words, but my intent is to deliberately seek to be a better, a more competitive, administrator working to accomplish at least two very challenging goals.

Do not punish an innocent

Do not abandon an innocent to be punished because of said abandonment

Posterity can be given Liberty if we do not abandon the innocent among us; and I'm not innocent, not by a long shot, but at least, at the very least, I do not willfully choose to fabricate falsehoods intending to cover up crimes where the worst evil people are consuming everything for their own evil ends; including the enslavement of everyone under absolute dictatorship.

So here is John Darash seeking to offer ideas and procedures (due process) that effectively defend Liberty in this Nation, and here is an individual who rejects the free flow of that information on his authority?

In the history of people, in this country, meaner people have faced similar conflicts, reaching too quickly for less efficient methods of defending Liberty.

1. Trial by Jury when deliberate efforts to find agreeable remedy among those in controversy fail.

2. Willful use of public access broadcast media for the purpose of deceiving the many victims by covering up the crimes perpetrated by this gang of thieves, and their minions, who took over our Liberty, our government, which is based upon Natural Law, The Golden Rule, or God's Law, or common law, or whichever due process is due everyone without exception.

1. The story is that real authority is outside of our individual powers of authority other than nullification (refuse to be a part of a criminal government)

2. The story here is that another gate keeper guarding the criminals who stole our government is either doing so willfully, or is guilty of doing so unknowingly: just following orders without question.

Again, I know I write too much, so forgive me for that please.

skattums's picture

Could someone tell me the name of the communication tool John was talking about at the start of the show?

jburgs53's picture

To our Muslin Brother Hassan, I am sorry you're offended by magazines and newspapers in the PUBLIC Library, but there is censorship of materials in American PUBLIC libraries via their Community Standards. You need to file your complaint with you local PUBLIC Library. On the issue of the public park for open sex, video tape and photo with your cell phone issue and call the police and file your complaint. Sex in public is a against the statue law. Question, who is the victim here via the seen Sex Morays or your Morals?

jburgs53's picture

To our Muslin Brother Hassan, I am sorry you're offended by magazines and newspapers in the PUBLIC Library, but there is censorship of materials in American PUBLIC libraries via their Community Standards. You need to file your complaint with you local PUBLIC Library. On the issue of the public park for open sex, video tape and photo with your cell phone issue and call the police and file your complaint. Sex in public is a against the statue law. Question, who is the victim here via the seen Sex Morays or your Morals?

sofasurferlinux's picture

I know John Darash is hopeing to have a stenographer in court on the 7th to record the proceedings. I think it would be very worth while to also have a video record. Being able to watch the proceedings would be very educational and imagine whn the judges find out they are on youtube where everyone can watch them be chopped down.

I know in my neck of the woods cameras are not allowed in court. However, on the 7th there may be so many people trying to get into the courthuse that security will not be able to check everyone. This is where the small action cams come in handy. There are many to chose from. Some of the are only about 2 inches across and can easily be buried in a purse. Some may even be un-noticable hanging from a key chain. Prices range from around $29-$400 and evertything in between. ...$49 at Amazon but on sale at Meijer for $39

There are many brands...Emerson, GoPro, Xcel.

Something to consider.

fitzie777's picture

Yes, having it on record is essential. That said, since it is in common law jurisdiction, we don't need to ask them permission or hide our recording of the proceedings. It appears, by filing the Writ of Prohibition, NY grand jury has claimed the common law jurisdiction. As such, We the People, dictate the terms of what can or cannot occur. However, one may need to submit the proper request to the Court of Record (the common law grand jury) in writing, to make it official. After all it is a court, and the procedure of, common law or otherwise, still needs to be followed.

Drake's picture

After peaceful remedies are exhausted, we will come up against 'enforcement'.
I offer that as a separate branch, we will have to offer the same independent
There are 'offices' that have been vacant or never used in this area.
I hereby offer my services.
I hope I am found acceptable in this effort to serve.

AmerizonWarrior's picture

Berkeley County and Dorchester County have been constituted! The ball is rolling! Let's KEEP IT ROLLING!

mark4th's picture

BREAKING NEWS - Mandamus from the bench to Judge

the link to the PDF here is 404 - delete this post if you fix that btw :)

JAZ's picture

I noticed in the April 23, 2014 posting of documents, the first one dated 4/18/14 "Decision Rescinded.pdf", written by Raymond Elliott III Justice, the document is stamped in two places in big red letters "RESINDED". Sorry, but I cannot even find that word in a regular dictionary, much less Black's Law Dictionary.

Can someone tell me what RESINDED means. I am joking, of course, but do the New York Supreme Court even know how to spell ????? The words means nothing, because it is NOT a word.

I noticed that when it was posted on the NLA website, however, that the word is spelled correctly. Of course it was posted by the NLA team.

Rescind - to abrogate; annul; cancel, as a law.
Abrogate - to abolish; repeal; annul; cancel

Here is the posting under News/Breaking News:
POSTED APRIL 23, 2014 Next target court date May 12, 2014, stay-tuned for confermation. (confirmation)

14-04-18 Decision Rescinded.pdf
14-04-23 Writ of error.pdf
14-04-23 Fraud on the Court.pdf

When you view the document, the word RESINDED is in red ink. However, when you print the document, there is no RESINDED markings on the document.

In my book, spelling is important. Especially when issuing and filing court documents.

Jo Ann

sofasurferlinux's picture

Chat page with the radio shows is broken. I get a "404 error". Are the shows listed somewhere else? Also, does anyone have links to radio shows for other CLGJ locations?

sofasurferlinux's picture

So Jackson County, KY has a sheriff that has the courage that we need and wouldn't you know it, there doesn't seem to be anyone organizing that county. Just sayin', someone aught to jump on that opportunity.

sofasurferlinux's picture

And he is on Sheriff Mack's list of 2nd amendment supporters and he signed the CSPOA resolution.